Paver & Landscape Articles Post Your Article - It's FREE
September 23, 2018   
Flowing profits: using flowable fill in residential applications saves money  December 19, 2005

There are few things more exciting than creating a new application or market for an existing material or technology. I was trying to find a way to level a problem area at my home that would hold water whenever it rained. This area is used as an entrance and exit to my barn, so I wanted it to have good compaction.

The answer was flowable fill--a surprise material for this application if there ever was one. But using it in a residential application was a first. The story of how this collaborative effort happened is exciting.

We've been working with flowable fill at Superior Concrete, Frederick, Md., for about five years. We've used several designs, including Darafill from Grace Construction, and Rheocell, Master Builder's version. We've bad great success using these mixes. Once, we placed more than 500 yards for a utility project on Braddock Mountain. So we were no stranger to flowable fill.

While I was thinking about the entrance to my barn, I realized we were storing six skids of pavers at our yard that were slated to go into a patio project at the home of Ralph Kline, who owns Superior Concrete with his parents. After looking at those pavers, I started thinking about how to get the flowable fill to draw enough compaction to make this work.

I then approached one of our landscape customers with the idea of using flowable fill as a base for pavers. By using it over CR6 stone, we felt we could save much time in moving the material around a house, then tamping for compaction.

Eliminating callbacks

We also discussed the trouble of settlement in the areas of raised patios and swimming pool pads six months alter a project was completed. The landscaper believed that by using flowable fill in those areas, he could eliminate callbacks and complaints about sink spots, especially around pools and hard-to-reach areas that need good compaction.

A few days later, I talked with Tom Evans, promotion director for the Maryland Ready Mix Concrete Association, about the association's flowable fill committee projects. I told him this would be an excellent way to develop a new market for the material. We met several times the next few weeks to explore, ways to use all of the committee's research in an actual project.

We then tested different variations of flowable fill mix designs, including pumping some of them. Hap Powers, pump operator for Hollerbach Concrete Pumping, was very patient as we used the trial and error method to pump the mixes.

Finding the right mix

When we started with flowable fill, we worked with a manufactured sand for a base. We only wanted to use enough cement to reach 100 psi. Getting to a high compaction rating of 98% was important. We started with 100 pounds of cement and about 2000 pounds of sand. The trick was to get the proper percentage of air generated by either using Rheocell or Darafill.

Our first tests yielded lower than expected. We didn't have enough information to determine the amount of air we were entraining into the mix. So, using the above amounts of sand and cement as a control, we made several trial batches to work up a standard deviation. At the same time, we used the trials for test pours to see where the strength and compaction levels would reach. After several tests, we dialed in the air percentages and started working fly ash into the mix while lowering the cement content.

We discovered Rheocell entrained a little more air than the Darafill. Rheocell averaged 33%, Darafill 30%. We could not get either one to reach the 35% level that was supposed to be attainable. We figured the Loss on Ignition (LOI) percentage of the fly ash we were using could be the reason. Once we dialed everything in to yield a good mix, we used compaction testing equipment to determine our compaction level. It only took a few tests to find we could reach 95% in roughly six hours with this mix. All three trial batches were at 98% the following day.

Our first trials resulted in strength levels higher than expected. Using the manufactured sand we stock, it took less cementitious materials than a natural sand to reach the strength level we wanted. (A spade shovel should be able to dig up a good flowable fill the next day. Our first trials required a backhoe for removal.) Our final mix design was: 2310 pounds of manufactured sand; 38 pounds of cement; 57 pounds of fly ash; 31.2 gallons of water; and one bag of Rheocell.

We still had to come up with a pumpable mix that would still meet all of the criteria we wanted. It took several tries with subtle changes to eventually get a good, affordable pumpable mix. We now have a few different designs ranging from the original to a blended mix, to a pumpable mix that can be used in a 2-inch trailer pump and a boom pump.

There were many downfalls. Most involved clogging the pump and others dealt with yields and costs. Sometimes, the mixes would be so coarse, they wouldn't get past the first elbow in the pipe. Other times, it wouldn't clog until it was almost through to the end of the pump. And a few became clogged somewhere in the middle. Each time, Hap would have to break down and clean out, so we could clog him up again. In some ways, it was a lot of fun. And in other ways, it was very painful and frustrating. But in the end, we gained a tremendous amount of experience with flowable fill.

We went with the following mix for the project: 2150 pounds of natural silica sand; 100 pounds of cement; 400 pounds of fly ash; 45 gallons of water; and one bag of Rheocell.

The big day

With the preliminaries out of the way, it was finally time to put the idea to the test. After discussing our options, Ralph decided he wanted to use his patio project as our initial test. He wanted flowable fill used in three raised patios at the rear of his home which is nestled in a wooded area with very little access to the site.

The location was important. By using this setting, we would encounter almost any obstacle that might be involved in a residential project. It would certainly put our theory to the test of servicing hard-to-reach areas. We contracted Hollerbach for a 32-meter pump to reach over the two story home from the front and deposit flowable fill into the patio areas in the rear. Split-face block would constitute the outside wall and also serve as our forms.

On the day of the pour, Hap made a couple of sweeps to ensure he was clear of any hazards. A tree had to be removed from one area, with some spots being 30 inches deep where the tree stump had been.

With all of the prep work complete, we began pumping just after 2 p.m. We pumped it at a dump that made it practically self-leveling, so very little labor was needed. We initially pumped at a 6-inch slump, but realized more labor would be needed if we continued. So we adjusted to a 10-inch slump during the first load, and the result was noticeable. Making it self-leveling takes fewer people and less time. This helped keep costs down.

In all, 40 yards of flowable fill was placed and leveled in less than three hours by two people. Hap's remote control for the pump enabled him to be right on top of the pour site.

Finishing touches

Several people involved in planning the project and designing the mix visited the site during the pour. Everyone came away with a feeling of great success. By night, you could walk on the pour area with very little indentation.

Hawkins Landscaping set the block pavers the next morning when the compaction rating was 96%. There were two areas of the pads that were a little high, but all it took was a shovel and a garden rake to scratch off these areas and scoop them off the slab. Ralph and his crew then started to set the concrete pavers.

We showed how flowable fill could shorten project times by up to two days, a major savings in equipment and labor. It also helps the contractor reach areas that would otherwise be passed because of accessibility problems. It opens the door to savings, both by pump or poured by truck.

When you expand into areas such as swimming pools and patios, as well as many more landscaping and backyard projects, you can practically double your money with the time savings alone. My goal is to see everyone nationwide using it the next couple of years. If nothing else, it might lower the cost of a beautification project for anyone interested in putting in a pool or dressing up his property. This product has many uses in many areas. It's not just for covering pipe anymore.

Promoting Flowable Fill

Flowable fill is one of five market segments the Maryland Ready Mix Concrete Promotion council is involved in. The others are Insulating Concrete Forms, Concrete Paving, Residential Concrete, and Tilt-up Concrete Walls.

The Flowable Fill committee has been surveying county engineers in Maryland about their knowledge and use of the material. Each engineer has been given a technical reference binder. Residential usage is the most recent application for flowable fill the committee has identified.

Concrete Producer, The, Jan, 2004 by Dean Plank


Back to Articles >>

  Latest Articles

January 2008

September 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005
  More Resources

News/Press

Bookstore

Classified Ads

General Forum

Tradeshows

Associations

Industry Links

Request Info

If you're having any
Web site problems,
please report a bug