Paver & Landscape Articles Post Your Article - It's FREE
December 15, 2018   
The Worst Thing You Can Do to a Tree  September 10, 2006

The most common reason given for topping is to reduce the size of a tree. Home owners often feel that their trees have become too large for a site. People fear that tall trees may pose a hazard. Topping, however, is not a viable method of height reduction and certainly does not reduce the hazard. In fact, topping will make a tree more hazardous in the long term.

The Cost in Stress

Topping often removes 50 to 100 percent of the leaf-bearing crown of a tree. Because leaves are the food factories of a tree, removing them can temporarily starve a tree. The severity of the pruning triggers a sort of survival mechanism. The tree activates latent buds, forcing the rapid growth of multiple shoots below each cut. The tree needs to put out a new crop of leaves as soon as possible. If a tree does not have the stored energy reserves to do so, it will be seriously weakened and may die.

A stressed tree is more vulnerable to insect and disease infestations. Large, open pruning wounds expose the sapwood and heartwood to attacks. The tree may lack sufficient energy to chemically defend the wounds against invasion, and some insects are actually attracted to the chemical signals trees release.

The Cost in Disease

The preferred location to make a pruning cut is just beyond the branch collar at the branch’s point of attachment. The tree is biologically equipped to close such a wound, provided the tree is healthy enough and the wound is not too large. Cuts made along a limb between lateral branches create stubs with wounds that the tree may not be able to close. The exposed wood tissue begins to decay. Normally, a tree will “wall off,” or compartmentalize, the decaying tissues, but few trees can defend the multiple severe wounds caused by topping. The decay organisms are given a free path to move down through the branches.

Branches within a tree’s crown produce thousands of leaves to absorb sunlight. When the leaves are removed, the remaining branches and trunk are suddenly exposed to high levels of light and heat. The result may be sunburn of the tissues beneath the bark, which can lead to cankers, bark splitting, and death of some branches.

The Cost in Liability

The survival mechanism that causes a tree to produce multiple shoots below each topping cut comes at great expense to the tree. These shoots develop from buds near the surface of the old branches. Unlike normal branches that develop in a socket of overlapping wood tissues, these new shoots are anchored only in the outermost layers of the parent branches.

The new shoots grow quickly, as much as 20 feet in one year, in some species. Unfortunately, the shoots are prone to breaking, especially during windy conditions. The irony is that while the goal was to reduce the tree’s height to make it safer, it has been made more hazardous than before.
If the tree survives, it will require pruning again within a few years. It will either need to be reduced again or storm damage will have to be cleaned up. If the tree dies, it will have to be removed.

Topping is a high-maintenance pruning practice, with some hidden costs. One is the reduction in property value. Healthy, well-maintained trees can add 10 to 20 percent to the value of a property. Disfigured, topped trees are considered an impending expense.

Another possible cost of topped trees is potential liability. Topped trees are prone to breaking and can be hazardous. Because topping is considered an unacceptable pruning practice, any damage caused by branch failure of a topped tree may lead to a finding of negligence in a court of law.

The Cost in Aesthetics

The natural branching structure of a tree is a biological wonder. Trees form a variety of shapes and growth habits, all with the same goal of presenting their leaves to the sun. Topping removes the ends of the branches, often leaving ugly stubs. Topping destroys the natural form of a tree.

Without leaves (up to 6 months of the year in temperate climates), a topped tree appears disfigured and mutilated. With leaves, it is a dense ball of foliage, lacking its simple grace. A tree that has been topped can never fully regain its natural form.

Alternatives to Topping

Sometimes a tree must be reduced in height or spread. Providing clearance for utility lines is an example. There are recommended techniques for doing so. If practical, branches should be removed back to their point of origin. If a branch must be shortened, it should be cut back to a lateral that is large enough to assume the terminal role. A rule of thumb is to cut back to a lateral that is at least one-third the diameter of the limb being removed.

This method of branch reduction helps to preserve the natural form of the tree. However, if large cuts are involved, the tree may not be able to close over and compartmentalize the wounds. Sometimes the best solution is to remove the tree and replace it with a species that is more appropriate for the site.

Case Study: Pepper Trees Decapitated

“I am writing in regards to the California pepper trees that you appointed me to assess in Nov. 2005. The trees were pruned by an unknown party two weeks ago.

“The California Pepper Tree, Schinus molle, is a native of South America and its dried and roasted berries are used as a pepper substitute. The tree reaches a maximum height of 50 feet, grows 30 inches a year and its longevity is 50–100 years. The tree tolerates acidic to alkaline soils and prefers clay/loam/sand with moderate moisture, and full sun to partial shade.

“Basic rules to follow when pruning a tree include: avoiding the removal of more than 25 percent of the living crown in one growing season, avoiding the removal of limbs that are over one-third the diameter of the parent limb, cutting between lateral limbs (stubs), and making flush cuts.

“The key factor determining the survivability of the most affected tree is the lack of adequate lateral branches to prune back to in order for the tree to regain a healthy crown structure. The tree was topped, and the cuts made on the tree are stubs which hinder a trees ability to close wounds. Wounds provide entry for pests and fungi that damage the cambium preventing the formation of woundwood, which is crucial in the healing process. When woundwood does not form, the compartmentalization of damaged tissue does not happen, and cavities may form.


“Removal and replacement of the tree is my foremost recommendation. The tree is approximately 20 to 30 years of age. Age is a key factor in that this tree will be slow to put on new growth, and hence, the recovery process will be slower. Mitigation will require time, effort, and money that may be greater than or equal to replacement.

“It is possible that new limbs can be nurtured, over time, from sprouts. Provided that sprouts will grow from the sealed wounds, in approximately one year a Certified Arborist can be hired for the purpose of a crown restoration. Crown restoration is the process of training sprouts into new dominant branches. The process will require yearly pruning and take years (over five) to accomplish. A note of caution to this option is that sprouts grow vigorously and are weakly attached, and in addition to the parent tissues injury the restored limbs may be at risk of failure. Pruning costs are determined after an individual or company has viewed the tree to make an estimate.”

Back to Articles >>

  Latest Articles

January 2008

September 2007

July 2007

June 2007

May 2007

March 2007

February 2007

January 2007

November 2006

October 2006

September 2006

August 2006

July 2006

June 2006

May 2006

April 2006

March 2006

February 2006

January 2006

December 2005

November 2005

October 2005

September 2005

August 2005
  More Resources



Classified Ads

General Forum



Industry Links

Request Info

If you're having any
Web site problems,
please report a bug